Be the brand AI names
when your buyer asks.
A researcher, writer, PR rep, link buyer and analyst — compiled into software. It finds where you’re invisible across 17+ AI engines, writes the fix and ships it live.
Country, language and email — auto-detected. Change
Every feature, as it actually looks.
These are the real panels from the report and the dashboard — same data, same layout. Click a chapter to jump.
Earned every month — not owned. The day a rival out-publishes you, it moves to them.
~$5,417/mo of that lead is contestable — a challenger closing the gap takes it first.
6.1M
4.1M
1M
201K
6.1M
1.8M
You’re absent from the questions buyers ask. So it writes the answer and gets it indexed.
⚙ You choose the mode: ultra-granular control over every step — or hands-off autopilot.
AI cites the same shopping guides and review sites. It gets your PRODUCTS into them — one approved email at a time.
Hi — great roundup. I noticed you cite bluemercury.com as a source. Quick data point for your next update: we measure AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI) daily on exactly this buyer question, and Sephora is the option readers keep asking about that the current list misses…
Hundreds of hours digging link marketplaces — done in seconds. Placements on the shopping guides AI already cites for your products.
| Domain | Authority | DR | Offers | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Linkhouse AI-cited 299× | 62 moz | 26 | GP | €1,300 |
Collaborator AI-cited 36× | 48 as | 47 | GP + NE | €2,641 |
Publisuites AI-cited 11× | 21 tf | 10 | NE | €69 |
Your brand-visibility score before → after go-live, net of the rest of the market’s drift over the same period. Nobody else closes this loop.
| Domain | Published | Baseline (before → after) | Total mentions | Brand-vis Δ (vs market) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12 | 14d / 6r → 21d / 9r | 3 → 11 | 18→27 (+9) | ▲ up +0.4/run | |
| Jun 28 | 9d / 4r → 15d / 7r | 1 → 8 | 22→29 (+7) | ★ newly cited | |
| Jul 03 | 11d / 5r → 12d / 5r | 4 → 4 | 25→25 (0) | ≈ flat | |
| Jul 15 | 8d / 3r → 6d / 2r | 5 → 2 | 24→20 (−4) | ▼ down −0.3/run |
Everyone else hands you a report. This pushes the change live — and it snapshots your existing schemas first, so you can recover them.
This is the payroll you’re NOT hiring.
Four brands we tracked for months.
Every number counted from stored runs.
Observational tracking of public AI answers. No projections, no industry benchmarks — our own runs, auditable.
The citation graph widened ×2.6 — citations from sources naming the brand grew +76%. The lift is a graph story, not a website story.
Its firewall blocks GPTBot and PerplexityBot — the engines can’t read the site. All of that visibility rides on third parties.
Even apple.com is 0.2% of market citations. Reviewer sites write the AI’s answer — the source graph is the game.
The decline case: −23 points in one week when the engines dropped Yelp from the answer. Borrowed visibility, gone overnight.
Our competition reports. airankia acts, transacts and proves.
Most of them watch well — and two of them watch things we do not. Where we are different is what happens after the dashboard.
| airankia | Profound | Otterly | Peec AI | Semrush | Ahrefs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it watches | ||||||
| Tracks AI mentions, rank and share of voice | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Chinese engines — Baidu, Qwen, Kimi, DeepSeek | ● | — | — | — | — | — |
| AI-bot log analytics (what crawls your site) | ● | ● | — | — | — | — |
| Real consumer prompt-volume data | — | ● | — | — | — | ● |
| What it does about it | ||||||
| Publishes into your CMS | ● | ● | — | — | — | — |
| Ships schema, llms.txt and internal links live | ● | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buys the links AI already cites | ● | — | — | — | — | — |
| Proves the citation lift against a control | ● | — | — | — | — | — |
| Platform | ||||||
| MCP server | ● | — | from $189 | — | — | — |
| Classic SEO suite — keywords, backlinks, domains | ● | — | — | — | ● | ● |
| What it costs | ||||||
| Entry price | $99 | $99 | $29 | $95 | $99 | $199 |
| what that buys | 50 prompts · 17+ engines · deploys | Starter · $399 Growth | 15 prompts · 4 engines | per brand · unlimited seats | add-on · AI from Guru $139.95 | per AI index · $699 all · +$129 base |
Checked on their own sites and public reviews, 16 Aug 2026. A dash means we did not find it advertised — not that it cannot be done. Prices are the cheapest public entry point: Semrush needs the AI toolkit on top of a plan, Ahrefs charges per AI index over a base plan. Two rows we lose on purpose: Profound and Ahrefs have real consumer prompt-volume data and we do not, and Semrush and Ahrefs have far more mature classic SEO suites. Spot something out of date? Tell us and we will fix the table.
Meet Ranki, your growth brain with 256 agents.
Ranki is what seven people, three hundred hours a month and about $20,900 of payroll look like once they are compiled into software: 45 capabilities, 256 agents, and none of them waiting for Monday. What a team does in a week, Ranki does tonight. Each halo in the map is one of those seven jobs — that is the payroll on the left, drawn.
See more detailsClose
Overview · Command Center · Tracked Prompts · Source Influence · Semantic Map
GEO Strategy & ROI · Agents · GEO Proposals · Add Prompts
AI Prompt Discovery · LLM Readiness Audit · Agent-Readiness Scan · AI Schema Creator · AI Overview Keywords · AI Search · AI Traffic · Query Explorer · Page Intelligence
Summary · Details · Trends
Market Benchmark · Competitors · Keyword Intelligence · Domain Overview · SERP Rank Tracker
Link Building · Publishers Media Kit · Integrations
Every one of those screens opens into its own tabs — Model Share, Query Fan-Outs, Domains, URLs, Tracked Prompts, Domain Ranking, URL Ranking, Citations, Rankings and 57 more. That is where the other 66 live.
A full blog CMS — or we publish into the one you already have.
Most AI-visibility tools hand you a document and wish you luck. Here the article is written, scored, given its schema and published — into your CMS, or into ours.
You do not have a blog. Now you do.
A hosted, multi-tenant blog with your logo, your colour, your favicon and your footer. Multi-language with real translations, an email subscriber list and newsletters — not a folder of drafts.
On your root domain. Not on a subdomain.
A blog on blog.yourbrand.com builds authority for a domain that is not yours to keep. We reverse-proxy it to yourbrand.com/blog through a Cloudflare Worker or nginx — same content, your root domain, your authority.
Keep your CMS. We write into it.
WordPress — the blog: our plugin pushes the article, its schema, llms.txt and a fresh sitemap.
Shopify — the blog and the store: articles, products, collections and pages, schema injected in the body, nothing to install. One brand, one destination, on purpose.
One of our customers told us what was missing. We left it up.
Real customers, real companies. We left the criticism in — it is the most useful review on this page.
The review we are proudest of is the one with a complaint in it.
Michael asked for the one thing we did not have yet. This is his review, exactly as it sits on G2 — incentive tag, criticism and all.
“Finally a tool that doesn’t just show me a score — it actually pushes the fix to the site.”
“The Audience Intelligence section alone was worth the subscription. We found audiences we had never considered.”
“The Citation Lift proof is the only thing that showed my client that a link ACTUALLY changed their AI mentions.”
The interface is optional. The platform is an API and an MCP server.
Every number on this page can be pulled without a browser. Point your own agent at it and it runs the scans, reads the rankings and pulls the citations while you sleep — no seat, no tab, no clicking.
Connect Claude, Cursor or any MCP client and it can drive the product directly.
Six live endpoints, your own keys, generated from Settings.
Watching every engine is free. You pay for what it DOES.
Watching your brand across the engines never burns credits. Action credits pay for the doing — articles, key pages, ecommerce, schema, links, and the images, graphs and charts generated inside them. Deploys to your live site are always free.
We ran AI campaigns for premium brands — and no tool could tell us if AI was recommending them. So we built it.
Deep performance-marketing experience across 100+ brands in retail, fitness, mobility and FMCG — paired with PhD-level scientific rigor and PMP methodology.
Frequently asked questions.
Generation and outreach — writing an article, generating its images, graphs and charts, generating schema, discovering contacts, sending a pitch. Deploying that schema, your llms.txt and your internal links to your live site is FREE. You pay to create, not to ship.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama, Mistral, Kimi, Qwen, Baidu Ernie — 17 models — PLUS Google AI Overviews AND AI Mode.
They’re read-only dashboards. We deploy the fix to your live site, buy the links AI cites, run the journalist outreach, build your audience — and then measure the citation lift. Analyze → act → transact → measure.
Yes — run the free scan above and see your mentions, rank and the gaps before you pay a cent.
Not every feature has autopilot — and we would rather say it. Fully automated today: article generation, content updates and shopping/ecommerce updates. Everything else is partially automated: it runs the work and waits for you to approve before anything ships. You can also take full control and edit every article, prompt, schema and link.
Yes — Citation Lift measures the before/after AI-citation gain of a link, net of the rest of the market’s drift over the same period — and holdback A/B experiments test whether a GEO action actually moved your share of voice.
Where does your brand stand in AI?
Run the same scan you just watched. Your engines, your gaps, your numbers — live in ~15 seconds. The engines are answering today, with or without you in the answer.
AI RankiaThe autonomous AI-visibility engine. Monitor · Get Cited · Content Hub · AI Links.
Part of Ideacharge LLC · est. 2018 · Bedford, NH